Ex-DA chief slams EO 62 backers' retention, says Marcos' cabinet revamp ignores farmers
By Jel Santos
Former Department of Agriculture (DA) secretary Leonardo Montemayor on Saturday, May 24, expressed dismay over the retention of key cabinet officials behind Executive Order (EO) No. 62, saying the Marcos Administration appears to be sidelining Filipino farmers in its ongoing leadership revamp.
Montemayor criticized the decision to keep officials he described as “main proponents” of EO 62, an order signed by President Marcos that significantly lowered tariffs on imported rice, pork, and corn, a move heavily opposed by agricultural groups.
“The main proponents of Executive Order No. 62 (which drastically reduced tariff protection for rice, pork and corn producers) have not been held accountable for their failed policy advice,” Montemayor said in a statement.
EO 62, signed in early May, slashed tariff rates on several agricultural products in a bid to curb food inflation.
But farmers and industry stakeholders have warned that the policy would worsen the plight of local producers already grappling with high input costs and competition from cheap imports.
Montemayor lamented that despite the sweeping implications of the order, farmer representatives appear to have been left out of the conversation during the recent shakeup in President Marcos’ cabinet.
“Unfortunately, it seems that the country’s farmers are not being consulted in the ongoing Cabinet changes,” he said.
The remarks come amid the reappointment of economic managers including National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) Secretary Arnesio Balisacan and Finance Secretary Ralph Recto, both seen as instrumental in shaping EO 62.
The two officials were retained by Marcos despite a broader Cabinet reorganization.
While the Palace has framed the retention of Balisacan and Recto as a move to ensure continuity in economic planning and fiscal management, agricultural groups like Montemayor’s Federation of Free Farmers (FFF) have pushed back, saying economic growth should not come at the cost of rural livelihoods.
As of press time, Malacañang has yet to respond to Montemayor’s statement.