Comelec en banc denies motion for reconsideration on Marcos' final DQ case
By Dhel Nazario
The Commission on Elections (Comelec) en banc has denied the Partial Motion for Reconsideration of the group Pudno Nga Ilokano in relation to the disqualification case they filed against President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.

In the 15-page resolution promulgated on Oct. 7, 2022, the Commission said that they find no "cogent" reason to disturb the findings of the First Division. It can be recalled that in its resolution promulgated on April 20, the former First Division denied the group's petition for "lack of merit".
The group is composed of Margarita Salonga Salandanan, Crisanto Palabay, Mario Ben, Danilo Consumido, Gil Derilo, Raoul Tividad, Nida Gatchalian, and Nomer Kuan.
On April 25, the petitioners filed before the Comelec en banc a Partial Motion for Reconsideration. In its Extremely Urgent Motion to Resolve, the petitioners stated that the bases and reasoning of the First Division are clearly "insufficient" to justify its resolution and are contrary to the law.
According to the Commission en banc, there is no basis for the petitioners to simply declare that "the bases and reasoning of the First Division are clearly insufficient to justify such resolution are contrary to law".
In their petition, petitioners said that the respondent is disqualified to run for or to hold any elective position, much less for the position of Philippine president, citing the following reasons:
- For having been found guilty by final judgment of crimes involving "moral turpitude" pursuant to Section 12 of the Omnibus Election Code.
- For having been found guilty, by final judgment, of a crime that carries the penalty of more than 18 months also pursuant to Sec. 12 of the OEC.
- For having been actually sentenced to prison correccional and is thereby effectively deprived of his "right ot suffrage" pursuant to Article 43 of the revised penal code in relation to Sec. 2 Article VII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.
- Also in view of his conviction for violation of Sec. 45 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1977 which in itself already carries the accessory penalty of perpetual disqualification from public office pursuant to Sec. 286 of the NIRC of 1977.
Their petition for disqualification was the seventh and final disqualification case filed against Marcos Jr.
In the resolution issued by the Commission en banc, they affirmed the resolution of the former First Division promulgated on April 20, 2022.