A lawyer has filed a vote-buying complaint before the Commission on Elections (Comelec) against Marikina City representative and mayoral candidate Marjorie Ann “Maan” Teodoro.
Lawyer Christian Real, representing one John David Ramos, cited systematic cash distributions disguised as government assistance during the official campaign period, which are considered violations of Sections 261(a), 261(b), and 261(o) of the Omnibus Election Code.
Included in the complaint are eight sworn affidavits from residents who received cash payouts, along with video and photographic evidence documenting the alleged vote-buying activities.
These materials have also been formally submitted to the Comelec for investigation. The Manila Bulletin acquired a copy of the complaint.
Key allegations in the complaint include: First, cash distributions during campaign period. cited were the events held in various barangays, including Barangay Sto. Niño, Marikina Heights, Concepcion Uno, and Jesus De La Peña, where attendees received ₱2,000 in cash.
These distributions occurred during the official campaign period, with some events reportedly extending into the early morning hours to avoid public scrutiny.
Second, use of Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) forms without DSWD presence. Recipients were allegedly required to sign blank forms resembling those used by the DSWD, yet no DSWD officials were present during these events.
Instead, barangay employees and known campaign leaders of Rep. Teodoro were alleged to have facilitated the distributions.
Third, campaign activities integrated with assistance programs. Attendees reported that campaign speeches were delivered by Rep. Teodoro during these events, promoting her candidacy. Claim stubs were also distributed after these speeches, which were then allegedly used to claim the ₱2,000 cash assistance.
And fourth, coercion and intimidation. In one incident, a bystander attempting to document the event was allegedly coerced into deleting photos and videos by individuals identified as campaign leaders. This act was captured on video and submitted as part of the evidence.
The complaint cited Comelec Resolution No. 11104, which presumes vote-buying in scenarios involving the distribution of assistance during the campaign period, especially when conducted by individuals associated with a candidate and without proper authorization from relevant government agencies.
Comelec was urged to conduct a thorough investigation into these allegations and to take appropriate legal action to uphold the integrity of the electoral process.