'Wala akong alam na kapalit': House justice panel execs deny Tiangco's impeachment bribe claim
At A Glance
- Navotas City lone district Rep. Toby Tiangco's claim that congressmen have been promised funding allocations in exchange for supporting the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte is baloney.
Batangas 2nd district Rep. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro (left), Manila 3rd district Rep. Joel Chua (PPAB)
Navotas City lone district Rep. Toby Tiangco's claim that congressmen have been promised funding allocations in exchange for supporting the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte is baloney.
Committee Chairman Batangas 2nd district Rep. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro and Vice Chairman Manila 3rd district Rep. Joel Chua had this to say Friday, March 20 as the panelnwas poised to move forward with the impeachment proceedings.
"Ano daw kapalit? Wala akong alam na kapalit (In exchange for what? I know nothing about that),” Luistro said.
“I don't know anything na tinutukoy ni Cong. Toby Tiangco na kapalit ng aming nagiging judgment, decision or position with regard to this impeachment complaint. For me--of course I cannot speak for others, but for me--talagang I see this as my constitutional duty that I should be able to discharge,” said the Batangueña.
(I don’t know anything that Congressman Toby Tiangco is referring to as a substitute for our judgment, decision, or position regarding this impeachment complaint. For me—and of course I cannot speak for others, but for me--I truly see this as my constitutional duty, one that I must be able to carry out.)
Chua, who had been participating actively in committee proceedings, made a similar denial about their House colleague's allegation?
“Unang una, hindi ko alam kung saan nanggagaling ‘yung allegation ni Cong. Toby, but just the same…umuusad pa rin po itong impeachment complaint. So nakita naman po ninyo ‘yung botohan. So ang mga congressman naman po, they will vote based on their conscience, based on evidence,” Chua, chairman of the House Committee on Good Government and Public Accountability, said.
The Metro Manila solon said everything the committee discussed was supported by evidence as witnessed by people who monitored the televised proceedings.
He said issues raised against VP Duterte on the mishandling of P612.5 million in confidential and intelligence funds received by the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Education (DepEd) when she was education secretary have remained unanswered.
“Lahat naman po ng iprinisenta is backed by evidence at saksi naman dito ang taong bayan, marami naman po nakapanood. So ‘yung mga issue na hanggang ngayon na mga katanungan, sila ‘yung Mary Grace Piattos (alleged fund recipient), hanggang ngayon hindi pa rin mahanap kung nasaan,” Chua noted.
(Everything that has been presented is backed by evidence, and the public has witnessed it, many have seen it themselves. Yet questions remain: for instance, the issue of Mary Grace Piattos, to this day, her whereabouts are still unknown.)
“Yung question na P1-million safe house na nirentahan, hanggang ngayon hindi pa rin malaman kung nasaan. ‘Yung testimonya po, ng mga AFP personnel na sinasabi nila were asked to certify that funds were downloaded to youth summit, but in truth wala naman po talagang pondo na na-download,” he recalled.
(The question of the P1‑million safe house that was supposedly rented, until now, it has not been determined where it is. The testimonies of AFP personnel also stated they were asked to certify that funds were downloaded to a youth summit, but in truth no funds were ever downloaded.)
Chua points out that the impeachment process is actually a forum for the Vice President to clear her name ahead of the 2028 presidential elections, wherein she will be a contender.
“Yung (The) impeachment process, it is a test of character and conduct of a public official. Now, you are going to run come 2028.
"Hindi ba mas maganda, once you are acquitted, tatakbo ka na wala kang extra baggage. And this is actually the right opportunity for her to clear her name. Pag takbo niya at least kung ano mang mga ibato sa kaniya, malinis ang kanyang pangalan. Keysa ‘yung tumatakbo ka na meron kang mga issues na kagaya po nito,” Chua said.
(Wouldn’t it be better, once you are acquitted, to run for office without extra baggage? This is actually the right opportunity for her to clear her name. When she runs, at least whatever accusations are thrown at her, her name will already be clean. That is better than running while still burdened with issues like these.)