A single comment made during a legislative hearing has ignited a broader national conversation on gender respect, public accountability, and the persistent objectification many Filipino women continue to face—an issue thrust into sharper focus as the country marks National Women’s Month this March.

The Philippine Commission on Women (PCW) on Wednesday, March 4, issued a strongly worded statement condemning remarks made by Deputy Minority Leader and Quezon City 4th District Rep. Jesus “Bong” Suntay during a House Committee on Justice hearing on March 3. During the hearing, Suntay reportedly said upon seeing actress Anne Curtis: “Nakita ko si Anne Curtis… may desire sa loob ko na nag-init talaga.”

PCW said Suntay’s words were not a “harmless comment,” but a form of sexual objectification delivered in a public forum by an elected official—an act the agency said reinforces a culture of harassment and disrespect toward women.

“These words are not harmless expressions of respect. They are a public act of sexual objectification—a declaration of predatory desire directed at a woman, made openly by a person who holds public trust and authority,” PCW said.

“They reduce a woman to an object of male desire, normalizing a culture of harassment that Filipino women experience every day in streets, workplaces, and public spaces,” the commission added.

The controversy erupted after Suntay’s comment circulated online following the congressional hearing.

PCW argued that the statement reduced a woman to an object of male desire and highlighted how sexist language can persist even in the country’s highest institutions.

“Ang dignidad ng babae ay hindi paksa ng biro, pagnanasa, o komentaryo. Ito ay karapatang pantao na hindi dapat yurakan ng kahit sino, lalo pa ng isang mambabatas ng Kongreso (A woman’s dignity is not a subject for jokes, desire, or commentary. It is a human right that must never be violated by anyone, especially by a member of Congress),” PCW said.

The commission stressed that such remarks are especially troubling when made by public officials whose words carry institutional authority and influence social norms.

For many women, the statement echoes everyday experiences—from catcalling on the streets to inappropriate comments in workplaces and public spaces.

“They are an affront not only to Ms. Anne Curtis, but to every Filipino woman who has been made to feel unsafe by the unbridled language of those in power,” PCW added.

Beyond condemning the remark, PCW emphasized that such language may fall under existing laws protecting women from harassment and discrimination.

The commission cited Republic Act No. 11313, also known as the Safe Spaces Act or Bawal Bastos Law, which defines gender-based harassment to include sexist, derogatory, and degrading remarks in public spaces.

It also referenced Republic Act No. 9710, the Magna Carta of Women, which guarantees women’s right to dignity and protection from all forms of gender-based violence.

Additionally, PCW noted that the conduct of public officials is governed by Republic Act No. 6713, which requires them to respect the rights of others and avoid acts contrary to law, good morals, and public interest.

On the international level, the Philippines is bound by the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), which obliges states to eliminate stereotypes and practices that perpetuate discrimination against women.

PCW urged Suntay to issue an “immediate and unqualified public apology”—one that accepts full responsibility rather than offering a conditional apology.

“The PCW calls on Representative Suntay to issue an immediate, unqualified public apology—not the kind that begins with ‘if anyone was offended,’ but one that takes full and unambiguous responsibility for the harm his words have caused,” the commission said.

READ: 

The commission also recommended that the lawmaker undergo gender sensitivity training and gender-fair communication seminars to better understand the harm caused by sexual objectification.

Beyond individual accountability, PCW called on the House Committee on Ethics and Privileges to examine the incident and determine whether administrative action is warranted.

“Silence or inaction from those in oversight positions would be tantamount to complicity in the normalization of harassment,” PCW said.

PCW stressed that the incident is not isolated but part of a broader cultural problem in which women’s bodies and identities are treated as subjects of commentary and control.

“This incident is not isolated. It reflects a deeply entrenched culture that treats women’s bodies and personhood as subjects of male commentary, desire, and control,” PCW said.

“It reflects the very architecture of gender inequality that the PCW, through law, policy, and advocacy, exists to dismantle,” it added.

Despite the passage of landmark legislation such as the Safe Spaces Act and the Magna Carta of Women, PCW said true gender equality requires more than laws—it requires public officials and society to embody the values those laws represent.

“Public office is not merely a position of authority; it is a position of example,” PCW said.

PCW reiterated that respect for women is not optional, especially for those who write and enforce the nation’s laws.

Addressing the controversy directly, the commission also expressed solidarity with Curtis and Filipino women who may have felt diminished by the remark: “Your dignity is not negotiable. Your personhood is not available for public consumption. You deserve better from those who hold public trust.”