CTA voids Cabanatuan City's P143-M real property taxes assessed vs NFA
The Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) has reversed its earlier decision and declared as void the P143 million in real property taxes (RPT) assessed by the local government of Cabanatuan City against the National Food Authority (NFA).
In an amended decision, the CTA granted the motion filed by NFA to reconsider the tax court’s May 20, 2024 decision on the payment of RPT.
The CTA had dismissed the NFA petition for lack of jurisdiction for failure to file its appeal on time. However, in its motion for reconsideration, the CTA said that NFA was able to prove by competent evidence that its appeal was filed within the reglementary period provided in the rules.
"Consequently, the Notices of Delinquency issued by the respondent City Treasurer of the City of Cabanatuan, demanding payment of real property taxes in the amount of P143,165,780.67 against the National Food Authority in relation to the real properties located at Maharlika Highway, Imelda District, Cabanatuan City, Nueva Ecija covered by Transfer Certificate of Title No. 59467 are hereby declared void," the CTA ruled.
The CTA said that central to the resolution of the case of the NFA's exemption from RPT is its status as a government entity.
Citing Section 234(a) of the Local Government Code of 1991, the CTA said that the only thing that would void the NFA's exemption from RPT is if it is proven that the beneficial use of the properties has been granted to a taxable person.
In this case, the CTA said the properties are being utilized by the NFA in furtherance of its public service operations.
Its witnesses also testified that the properties subject of this case are used as offices for NFA's operation in Cabanatuan City and warehouses used for storage of NFA's buffer stock, the court also said.
The CTA said: "In sum, since Petitioner NFA is a government instrumentality, its real properties which are being used by NFA for public service are exempt from RPT. In view thereof, the Notices of Delinquency issued by the respondents are void for lack of legal basis."
The 15-page amended decision was written by Associate Justice Corazon G. Ferrer-Flores with the concurrence of Associate Justice Maria Rowena Modesto-San Pedro.