What will House ethics panel do to Alvarez? Chairman Espares answers
At A Glance
- The House Committee on Ethics and Privileges current has "no basis" to hear a case against Davao del Norte 1st district Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez, who recently grabbed headlines for asking the country's soldiers to turn their back on President Marcos.

COOP-NATCCO Party-list Rep. Felimon Espares (left), Davao del Norte 1st district Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez (Contributed photo, Facebook)
The House Committee on Ethics and Privileges current has "no basis" to hear a case against Davao del Norte 1st district Rep. Pantaleon Alvarez, who recently grabbed headlines for asking the country’s soldiers to turn their back on President Marcos.
Committee chairman, COOP-NATCCO Party-list Rep. Felimon Espares made this clarification amid calls from other House members to subject the former speaker to ethics case proceedings.
In a chance interview at the House of Representatives Thursday, April 18, Espares said they've yet to receive a complaint against Alvarez.
"So far, wala pa naman natanggap tayo, so meaning, ang Committee on Ethics ngayon, silent pa. Unless otherwise, there's something na ma-receive yung committee natin," he said
(So far, we haven't received any, so meaning, the Committee on Ethics is silent as of now. Unless otherwise, there's something that the committee will receive.)
Espares said that currently there's "no basis to start" with a case against Alvarez, a known staunch ally of former president Rodrigo Duterte.
On Sunday, April 14, during a peace rally in Tagum City, Davao del Norte, Alvarez called on the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to turn its back on President Marcos. This, as he expressed frustration over how Marcos has handled the situation in the West Philippine Sea (WPS) where there is rising tension between Manila and Beijing.
Alvarez said that a withdrawal of support from Marcos would force the latter to step down.
Some congressmen have even branded these remarks as "seditious".
Regarding Alvarez's very public statements, Espares commented: "It's just a statement, tsaka wala talaga tayong basis (and we don't have a basis)."
When asked specifically if he thinks there's no basis to tag Alvarez with disorderly conduct, the party-list solon replied, "Yes."
"Unless...na may mag-complaint (somebody files a complaint), so that's the time that we could start the committee action...We will just wait kung mayroon man (if there's any)," Espares said.
He further said that the reported investigations of the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Philippine Navy on Alvarez have nothing to do with the House.