Reduce rice tariffs instead, no to price caps - FEF


At a glance

  • “The government can afford to lower rice tariffs because the mandatory P10 billion allocation for the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) as stipulated by the Rice Tariffication Law (RTL), has already been achieved,” says the Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF).

  • FEF quoted a recent report by the Bureau of Customs (BOC) that tariff revenues from rice import stands at a healthy P16.8 billion as of Aug. 23.


The Foundation for Economic Freedom (FEF) has called on the government to lift or reduce import tariffs for rice from 35 percent to 10 percent to arrest the surging price of rice rather than impose a price ceiling on rice.

In a statement, FEF said Executive Order (EO) 39, which imposes a price ceiling on rice, will only harm Filipino consumers and farmers, and the entire economy.

EO 39 imposes a price cap of P41 per kilo on regular-milled rice and P45 per kilo on well-milled rice starting next week, Sept. 5.

FEF explained that the price cap will harm consumers because it will drive supply away from the market, fuel a black market for rice, cause traders to cheat consumers by mixing inferior broken rice with regular and well-milled rice, and incentivize traders to hoard as the price ceiling is below their procurement and selling prices.

“Lower-income consumers in particular will suffer when regular milled rice becomes less available in markets at a controlled price and is passed on as well-milled rice by traders,” FEF said.

EO 39 will similarly harm farmers because traders will use the price cap to justify lowering their buying prices for palay or simply refuse to buy palay from the farmers as they will lose money due to the high farmgate price of palay.  

In addition, FEF said that the price ceiling will not be effective in solving the demand-supply gap and arrest increasing food price inflation.  ”It will only aggravate the current tight rice supply situation into a full-blown rice crisis.  An Executive Order cannot repeal the law of supply and demand,” it added.

Instead, FEF suggested that import tariffs, currently set at 35 percent for rice imports from ASEAN countries, be lifted or reduced to 10 percent for immediate effect on lowering rice prices.

“The government can afford to lower rice tariffs because the mandatory P10 billion allocation for the Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF) as stipulated by the Rice Tariffication Law (RTL), has already been achieved,” it added.

FEF quoted a recent report by the Bureau of Customs (BOC) that tariff revenues from rice import stands at a healthy P16.8 billion as of Aug. 23.

FEF further said that government may restore the tariff rates back to 35 percent when the demand and supply situation stabilizes and if the onset of the harvest season results in falling rice prices.

Moreover, FEF called on the government to amend the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL) to increase the farmland retention limit which is set at five hectares to an economically viable twenty-four hectares.  

“Because of CARL, average farm sizes have fallen to one hectare or less.  The country needs bigger and better-managed farms to increase agricultural productivity, thereby increasing supply and reducing food prices.  Increasing domestic food production through commercial agriculture is the key to meeting the challenge of meeting the food requirements of an increasing population and solving the country’s serious malnutrition problem,” the statement concluded.

Meantime, the Federation of Free Farmers said they understand and appreciate Marcos' good intentions in issuing EO no. 39, but the order may have the unintended effects of  reducing the quantity of rice sold to consumers if the mandated caps will make retailers' business unprofitable and lowering palay farmgate prices for farmers and discourage future palay production."