DILG files 15 more cases against barangay officials regarding SAP anomalies
By Chito Chavez
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) on May 23, Saturday, said at least 15 more cases are being prepared against erring barangay officials with the probe on the alleged anomalies in the cash aid deliveries under the social amelioration program (SAP) being further intensified.
DILG undersecretary and spokesman Jonathan Malaya (DILG 10 via PIA / MANILA BULLETIN)
Aside from the 15 cases being prepared, DILG Undersecretary and spokesperson Jonathan Malaya said there are 93 more barangay officials under investigation.
In a press briefing, Malaya said that DILG Secretary Eduardo Año gave the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group of the Philippine National Police strict orders to handle the cases against the barangay officials involved in SAP anomalies.
Based on the latest records, Malaya noted that more than 400 individuals have filed their complaints against the erring barangay officials who were involved in SAP-related irregularities. Recently, the CIDG has filed criminal charges against 42 barangay officials for splitting or collecting kickbacks from cash aid distributed to poor families.
Malaya said the DILG has welcomed the increasing number of complaints against corrupt barangay officials since the President is hell bent on getting rid of deceitful people in government service. The DILG noted that 42 barangay officials are now facing charges for their supposed involvement in SAP anomalies. Malaya said that the number of barangay officials being charged will still increase as case build-ups are being conducted by the CIDG.
Colonel Arnold Thomas Ibay CIDG-National Capital Region (NCR) chief said that his men have responded quickly and have intensified their probe against barangay officials with SAP-related corruption complaints in Metro Manila. Several complainants in Quezon City observed that the barangay officials who are the subject of the corruption complaints have scampered to prepare reasons to the CIDG on why they included their kin, friends, supporters and relatives in the list of the first tranche of beneficiaries in the cash aid.
Ibay stressed that “nepotism and favoritism’’ are corrupt acts and should merit appropriate penalties in accordance with existing laws. As the CIDG-NCR men carried out their SAP-related complaints probe, many individuals who are not deserving of the SAP cash aid returned their financial grants.
DILG undersecretary and spokesman Jonathan Malaya (DILG 10 via PIA / MANILA BULLETIN)
Aside from the 15 cases being prepared, DILG Undersecretary and spokesperson Jonathan Malaya said there are 93 more barangay officials under investigation.
In a press briefing, Malaya said that DILG Secretary Eduardo Año gave the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group of the Philippine National Police strict orders to handle the cases against the barangay officials involved in SAP anomalies.
Based on the latest records, Malaya noted that more than 400 individuals have filed their complaints against the erring barangay officials who were involved in SAP-related irregularities. Recently, the CIDG has filed criminal charges against 42 barangay officials for splitting or collecting kickbacks from cash aid distributed to poor families.
Malaya said the DILG has welcomed the increasing number of complaints against corrupt barangay officials since the President is hell bent on getting rid of deceitful people in government service. The DILG noted that 42 barangay officials are now facing charges for their supposed involvement in SAP anomalies. Malaya said that the number of barangay officials being charged will still increase as case build-ups are being conducted by the CIDG.
Colonel Arnold Thomas Ibay CIDG-National Capital Region (NCR) chief said that his men have responded quickly and have intensified their probe against barangay officials with SAP-related corruption complaints in Metro Manila. Several complainants in Quezon City observed that the barangay officials who are the subject of the corruption complaints have scampered to prepare reasons to the CIDG on why they included their kin, friends, supporters and relatives in the list of the first tranche of beneficiaries in the cash aid.
Ibay stressed that “nepotism and favoritism’’ are corrupt acts and should merit appropriate penalties in accordance with existing laws. As the CIDG-NCR men carried out their SAP-related complaints probe, many individuals who are not deserving of the SAP cash aid returned their financial grants.