EDITORS DESK
As technology becomes increasingly integrated into our lives, a seemingly logical question arises: If we can bank online, why can't we vote online? However, cybersecurity professionals warn that internet voting is not the next logical step in the progression of voting technology but rather a significant threat to democratic elections. While advancements in technology have transformed various aspects of our lives, the risks posed by online voting to the integrity of the electoral process cannot be ignored.
One of the most critical reasons why internet voting is not a favorable idea is security. The internet is inherently insecure, and conducting elections online introduces a high risk of hacking and fraud. Cyberattacks targeting online voting systems could have catastrophic consequences, potentially compromising the fundamental principles of our democracy. It is crucial to ensure that robust security measures are in place to safeguard against malicious actors who may seek to undermine the electoral process.
Another concern is anonymity. In traditional elections, the secrecy of voters’ ballots is vital to protect them from coercion and intimidation. However, guaranteeing anonymity in an online voting system is challenging. The potential compromise of voter privacy raises significant doubts about the fairness of the electoral process. Safeguarding the anonymity of voters is essential to preserve the democratic ideals of free and unbiased elections.
Furthermore, accessibility is a crucial aspect to consider. Not all citizens have equal access to the internet or the necessary devices required for online voting. Introducing internet voting could lead to the exclusion of millions of voters who lack reliable internet connectivity or do not possess the required technology. This exclusion contradicts the principle of inclusivity and risks perpetuating inequalities in electoral representation.
Cost is another pertinent factor. Developing and implementing a secure and reliable online voting system would demand substantial financial investments. The costs associated with establishing robust infrastructure, implementing stringent security measures, and addressing potential vulnerabilities can be substantial. It is essential to evaluate whether allocating resources to an online voting system is the most prudent use of limited funds, especially when other critical areas require attention in the Philippines.
In addition to these concerns, practical challenges must be overcome before internet voting can be considered viable. Verifying the identity of voters and preventing fraudulent practices, such as multiple voting, pose significant hurdles. Establishing reliable authentication mechanisms and ensuring the accuracy and integrity of online votes require careful planning and rigorous implementation.
Considering the multifaceted challenges and risks associated with internet voting, it is crucial to approach its implementation in the Philippines with caution. As a cybersecurity analyst and technology editor, I advocate for a focus on improving the security, accessibility, and efficiency of traditional voting systems. By strengthening these aspects, we can maintain the integrity of elections while ensuring that all eligible citizens can exercise their right to vote confidently and securely.
While other countries may have experimented with online voting systems, the unique context of the Philippines demands a thoughtful approach. The stakes are high when it comes to democratic elections, and any compromises to the integrity and fairness of the process can have far-reaching consequences.
According to John Patrick Lita, CEO and co-founder of SOROS Securities Inc., and a veteran cybersecurity professional, there are several concerns regarding internet voting in the Philippines. These concerns include:
Security risk: Internet voting poses potential risks related to hacking, vote fraud, and tampering. These risks can compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the voting system and data.
Privacy and anonymity: Maintaining voters' privacy while ensuring their legitimacy and eligibility poses a challenge. How can the system verify voters without compromising their anonymity?
Digital gaps: The extent of internet access among Filipinos is a crucial factor. Some individuals' lack of digital access can create a voting risk, as those with malicious intent may take advantage of the situation.
Lack of transparency and auditability: Traditional voting systems provide physical evidence and receipts, ensuring transparency. It is essential to address how to verify that those who did not vote genuinely did not participate.
Trust and perception: Building public trust is crucial, especially considering the government's security posture and the need for robust cybersecurity practices. Merely passing a law is insufficient without solid cybersecurity measures and infrastructure implementation.
Furthermore, the issue of third-party security risk or supply chain security arises. It is important to ensure that vendors and providers involved in e-voting can be trusted. Establishing security practices, supply chain policies, and standards should be considered to qualify vendors for e-voting.
Business continuity is another aspect that needs attention. Questions regarding the commitment of the Commission on Elections (Comelec) to business continuity arise. How quickly can they restore servers in the event of downtime? What are the acceptable downtime and uptime standards? Are there IT capacity planning measures in place?
Data sovereignty is also crucial. All voting data should remain within the Philippines, and a special committee should control the data center to ensure data integrity, especially in logging.
These concerns highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to address internet voting security, privacy, transparency, trust, and technical aspects in the Philippines.
I urge stakeholders in the Philippines to thoroughly assess internet voting concerns before considering its use. Prioritizing the security, accessibility, and efficiency of traditional voting systems will enable us to preserve the integrity of elections while promoting inclusivity and ensuring that every vote counts. By taking a measured and cautious approach, we can navigate the intersection of technology and democracy to build a stronger and more resilient electoral system for the future.
(Art Samaniego, Jr. is the head of Manila Bulletin IT Department and is the editor of Technews.)