#ASKGOYO
Atty. Gregorio Larrazabal
I wrote a while ago about the seeming disconnect between offices and officials in government. How some offices and officials issue contradictory statements and orders. How the country missed several opportunities to help make things better in this pandemic, because it seems officials don’t talk with each other. Or maybe they talk, but they don’t listen.
We’ve seen the results of that miscommunication, or better described non-communication between officials. Policies announced, then within hours or a day or two, “modified”, “amended,” “revoked” or “clarified.” Then those “clarifications” later on “clarified.” AGAIN.
Normally policies, whether in the private sector or government, are discussed, threshed out and vetted BEFORE announcing. So, the public is informed one time of a policy that has ideally been discussed thoroughly. We’re not only talking about the policy to be announced, but also the manner it is announced. Remember, the message is at times as important as the way it’s conveyed.
Unfortunately, it’s as if draft guidelines are announced as rules, and when the public reacts, the guidelines are modified, amended, or even revoked. People are usually confused because some might miss the subsequent modifications and amendments to previous orders announced. If an official in a private company did this, he/she would be fired from the company.
So, what’s the roadblock for people to communicate with each other before making an announcement? No platform or means to do it? I assume government officials have a smartphone now. For reference, the top 10 phone brands in the world are (arranged alphabetically):
Atty. Gregorio Larrazabal
I wrote a while ago about the seeming disconnect between offices and officials in government. How some offices and officials issue contradictory statements and orders. How the country missed several opportunities to help make things better in this pandemic, because it seems officials don’t talk with each other. Or maybe they talk, but they don’t listen.
We’ve seen the results of that miscommunication, or better described non-communication between officials. Policies announced, then within hours or a day or two, “modified”, “amended,” “revoked” or “clarified.” Then those “clarifications” later on “clarified.” AGAIN.
Normally policies, whether in the private sector or government, are discussed, threshed out and vetted BEFORE announcing. So, the public is informed one time of a policy that has ideally been discussed thoroughly. We’re not only talking about the policy to be announced, but also the manner it is announced. Remember, the message is at times as important as the way it’s conveyed.
Unfortunately, it’s as if draft guidelines are announced as rules, and when the public reacts, the guidelines are modified, amended, or even revoked. People are usually confused because some might miss the subsequent modifications and amendments to previous orders announced. If an official in a private company did this, he/she would be fired from the company.
So, what’s the roadblock for people to communicate with each other before making an announcement? No platform or means to do it? I assume government officials have a smartphone now. For reference, the top 10 phone brands in the world are (arranged alphabetically):
- Apple
- Huawei
- Lenovo
- LG
- Mobicel
- Motorola
- Nokia
- Oppo
- Samsung
- Xiaomi
- CoverMe
- Dust
- Facebook Messenger
- Kakaotalk
- Line
- Signal
- Silence
- SureSpot
- Telegram
- Threema
- Viber
- Wickr Me
- Wire