BARRACKS AND STRATEGY
National security is commonly associated with military might. But today, the risks to our nation are felt at home, in the stores, and more and more in our waters. The country's concept of national security includes the health of our economy, the credibility of our political institutions, our social cohesion, the people’s trust, and our sovereignty. The state itself becomes at risk when these are eroded even slowly.
These pillars are now being assessed separately, but should be seen as deeply connected.
The main concerns for ordinary Filipinos are the rising cost of living, job security, and gas and food prices. In response, the government has provided vital but short-term financial aid and subsidies.
National attention is also being drawn to political issues, including accusations of widespread corruption at the highest levels of government, institutional conflicts, and impeachment proceedings. Even if such processes are constitutional, they impact the trust and confidence of the nation. And governance deteriorates in the absence of trust.
Another fact that must not be ignored is the pattern that emerged in the waters of the West Philippine Sea (WPS). Chinese vessels have been continuously present in our exclusive economic zone for a long time. According to reports, there were up to 90 Chinese warships and coast guard vessels in March 2026, 62 in April , and 36 in just the final week of May .
These movements are not accidental. They are examples of coordinated actions by the Chinese maritime militia, coast guard, and navy working together in key areas. Without our government's approval, some of these vessels have even been seen carrying out illegal maritime scientific research, including landing personnel close to Pag-asa island.
There is no armed conflict here, but what is witnessed is persistent pressure that is calm, steady, and methodical. We should understand that armed conflict is not the only method to lose sovereignty. It can also be diminished gradually. What starts as a fleeting presence becomes the norm. After being repeatedly done, the practice is accepted. The border that originally defined control becomes blurry when normalization occurs.
Sovereignty concerns may seem remote to Filipinos as they fight for everyday existence. After all, hunger and jobs cannot wait, and families must cope now, not later. This is understandable. However, it produces a risky imbalance as it may become a choice between bread and borders. The country cannot afford to decide between safeguarding the well-being of its citizens and defending its borders. Both are crucial and characterize national security.
Thus, the convergence of pressures becomes obvious. Our resistance is weakened by economic pressures, our concentration is divided by political turmoil, and cohesion is impaired by public mistrust. As a result, foreign players may take advantage of the conditions created by these internal forces. Foreign operations in disputed waters might exploit domestic political conditions to push limits and test reactions. The exact security risk is evident in the combined effect of convergence.
Meanwhile, the government is moving forward. Programs for relief are being put into action. There are monetary policies in place. There are still maritime patrols. There are diplomatic protests. These demonstrate intent and awareness. However, unity of purpose and clarity of direction are now vital.
We need to combat inflation at its source. Jobs that offer genuine and long-term financial security must be created. We must constantly demonstrate our sovereignty by being present, forming alliances, and steadfastly upholding international law. We also need to reestablish political unity. Leadership must show that the nation’s interests must come first. Responsibility, transparency, and observable outcomes will rebuild public trust. Without trust, even the best policies will fall short.
It is equally crucial that we draw the Filipino people closer to the question of sovereignty. The WPS is not an abstract issue. It is connected to energy resources, food security, and the country's long-term prosperity. Life at home is eventually impacted by what occurs there.
By now, the problems we face are linked in ways that make them tough to solve singly. External pressure, political instability, and socioeconomic distress are all parts of a single, broader reality.
When a country cannot support its citizens, it becomes weak. When a country is unable to protect its borders, it becomes vulnerable. However, a country that finds it difficult to accomplish both at once runs a much greater danger.
Our challenge is to secure both bread and borders with great urgency and tenacity, not to choose between the two. The stability of every Filipino family is the foundation of national security, but it demands to be fortified by our power to defend what is rightfully ours. Then and only then will we be able to declare that our country is truly secured for both this generation and future generations.
(Lt. Gen. Aurelio B. Baladad (Ret) served as the 8th commander of the Eastern Mindanao Command, the 32nd commander of the 3rd Infantry (Spearhead) Division, and the former deputy chief of staff for Operations, J3 of the AFP. He is now the VP for cooperative planning and marketing of PAFCPIC, a cooperative serving the active and retired AFP personnel.)