The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has expressed concern over the arrest of an online content creator for alleged digital manipulation of the statement of President Marcos to make it appear that the President is calling for the legalization of illegal narcotics.
Citing reports, the CHR said the female content creator was apprehended based on an arrest warrant for libel. She reportedly posted the altered video of the President on the social media platform Facebook.
There is an ongoing surveillance efforts by law enforcers against online creators or vloggers suspected of spreading disinformation or fake news.
On the arrest of the female online creator, the CHR reminded law enforcement agencies to remain "circumspect" in enforcing criminal laws that have a direct impact on the enjoyment of the freedom of expression by every individual.
"While there are limitations to freedom of expression, government-based sanctions that look into the truth or falsity of a statement are a form of content-based restraint that may be considered a prior restraint on free speech prohibited by Article III, Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution," the CHR said.
"The CHR voices serious concerns against enforcing content-based restraint enforced on pain of criminal or penal prosecution as it sends a chilling effect on other constitutionally protected forms of speech such as an individual’s freedom to express oneself, ethical journalism, and well-meaning political advocacy," it stressed.
Citing the Supreme Court's decision in Disini vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335 dated Feb. 11, 2014, the CHR reminded law enforcers that "any government threat of punishment regarding certain uses of the medium creates a chilling effect on the constitutionally-protected freedom of expression of the great masses that use it."
For its part, the CHR expressed its commitment to remain vigilant in monitoring possible infringements on the fundamental right to freedom of expression to avoid the overbearing application of in terrorem (legal fear) effect of criminal law on the well-meaning exercise of fundamental rights.