AI in the legal system: A boon or bane?


E CARTOON NOV 27, 2024.jpg

 

Supreme Court Chief Justice Alexander Gesmundo, in a recent remark, highlighted the transformative potential of artificial intelligence (AI) in revolutionizing the legal field. The Chief Justice’s statement comes at a time when technological advancements, particularly in AI, are reshaping industries and other sectors across the globe. 


Gesmundo’s gesture signals a significant shift in how justice may be administered in the future. AI has the potential to drastically improve the efficiency of legal work, reduce case backlogs, and enhance fairness in the dispensation of justice. 


AI can offer significant advantages in terms of speeding up the legal process. The automation of routine tasks like legal research, document review, and case analysis can help lawyers and judges focus on the substantive aspects of cases. Legal professionals can access relevant precedents and case law in a fraction of the time it would take through traditional methods, ultimately reducing delays and expediting the resolution of cases.


Moreover, AI can assist in predicting outcomes by analyzing patterns in past rulings. Through predictive analytics, AI can identify potential trends in case law, suggesting likely outcomes based on similar cases. This could not only help in prioritizing cases but also allow legal professionals to better allocate their time and resources, ensuring that urgent cases receive timely attention. As a result, AI has the potential to streamline judicial operations, reducing the backlog of cases that often hampers justice systems globally.


However, there are important safeguards necessary to prevent injustice due to AI’s inherent lack of empathy and emotional understanding. As with any major technological shift, the integration of AI into the legal process must be handled with caution to ensure that its use does not come at the cost of fundamental legal principles.


Despite the concerns that AI lacks human factors required for fair judgment, its role in ensuring just decisions cannot be overlooked. One of the key advantages of AI is the strong possibility that it will reduce human bias. Unlike human decision-makers, AI systems are not swayed by personal emotions or prejudices. By relying on data-driven insights, AI can help ensure that decisions are made based on merits rather than influenced by extraneous factors.
Furthermore, AI’s capacity for analyzing vast amounts of data can reduce errors that often occur in manual legal work. In a system where even small mistakes can have significant consequences, AI’s ability to quickly cross-reference and process information can lead to more accurate rulings.

 Additionally, AI could democratize access to legal resources by providing self-help tools to those who cannot afford representation. By making legal information more accessible, AI has the potential to level the playing field, ensuring that justice is not reserved for the wealthy and privileged.


While AI promises efficiency and fairness, its introduction into the legal system is not without risks. If AI models are trained on flawed or unrepresentative data, they could produce decisions that disproportionately disadvantage certain groups. Under these circumstances, the potential for AI to perpetuate or even exacerbate biases is high. 


To mitigate these risks, safeguards must be in place. First, transparency is crucial. Algorithms that power AI systems should be fully understood and auditable by legal professionals. 


In an ideal scenario, AI should function as a tool to support, not replace, human judgment. While AI can assist in analyzing data, judges and legal professionals should remain ultimately responsible for decisions, especially in sensitive cases. Human oversight ensures that the emotional and moral dimensions of a case, which AI cannot fully comprehend, are not overlooked.


The ultimate aim should be to use AI in a way that enhances, rather than diminishes, the human elements of justice.