House says 'no' to Roque's attempt to leave out his business records, SALN in POGO probe 


At a glance

  • The House quad-committee (quad-comm) has rejected the motion of former presidential spokesperson Harry Roque to quash a subpoena requiring him to submit various documents, including business records, tax returns, and Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALNs)


IMG-f9d9df07385afb1119b3921bf0a7e9d7-V.jpgLawyer Harry Roque (center) (Ellson Quismorio/ MANILA BULLETIN)

 

 

 

 

 

 



The House quad-committee (quad-comm) has rejected the motion of former presidential spokesperson Harry Roque to quash a subpoena requiring him to submit various documents, including business records, tax returns, and Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALNs) 

Roque, a central figure in the quad-comm probe, had initially promised to provide the joint panel with copies of the documents, which are considered crucial to the investigation into his alleged ties to illegal Philippine Offshore Gaming Operators (POGOs). 

However, he later filed a motion to quash the subpoena, arguing that the documents were irrelevant to the legislative investigation, violated his and his family's right to privacy, and infringed on his right to remain silent and protection against self-incrimination. 

Roque also failed to attend the last two hearings of the Quad Committee--on Aug. 28 and Sept. 4--prompting the panel to issue a show-cause order against him. 

On the motion of co-chairman Manila 6th district Rep. Bienvenido Abante Jr., the quad-comm ordered the embattled lawyer to explain his back-to-back absences,  as well as compelled him to attend the next session. 

Batangas 2nd district Rep. Gerville "Jinky Bitrics" Luistro moved to deny Roque’s motion to quash, which was swiftly approved by lead chairman Surigao del Norte 2nd district Rep. Robert Ace Barbers, after hearing no objections from the ,emebez. 

Luistro underscored the relevance of the requested documents, and cited tje “overwhelming circumstantial evidence” of Roque’s connection to Lucky South 99, an illegal POGO firm in Porac, Pampanga. 

She noted Roque’s denial of ties to POGOs and underscored the discrepancy between his limited income as a government official and the sudden surge in his assets, including his shares in Biancham Holdings, a family-owned company. 

Luistro argued that if Roque is unable to explain the sources of his wealth, it could strengthen the evidence of his involvement in POGO operations. 

She added that the investigation could lead to legislative changes, potentially revisiting laws such as the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees, Anti-Money Laundering Act, Corporation Law, and even the Code of Professional Responsibility and Accountability for Lawyers. 

ALSO READ: 

https://mb.com.ph/2024/9/4/pang-mag-asawa-mag-ama-lang-dela-serna-admits-joint-bank-account-with-roque

The committee has requested several documents from Roque, including the deed of sale for land in Multinational Village, Parañaque; documents on the transfer of Biancham shareholdings; the extra-judicial settlement of his aunt’s estate; SALNs from 2016 to 2022; and his 2018 income tax return. 

During a previous hearing, Luistro questioned Roque’s business activities and financial records. She pointed to significant inconsistencies between his declared assets and those of Biancham Holdings. 

Roque’s assets reportedly surged during the POGO boom under the Duterte administration, which raised further suspicions. 

Roque attributed the increase in assets to proceeds from the sale of a family property in Parañaque, but lawmakers expressed skepticism. 

He also denied being the lawyer for Lucky South 99, and stated that his client was Whirlwind, a POGO service provider. However, documents presented to the committee suggested he had dealings with both companies.