The Philippines, which has been clutching on Uncle Sam’s wallet for a lifeline, now stares down a 90-day funding freeze on President Trump’s order - proof that like a long-time lover, even foreign aid can ghost you without warning!
Just how deep are these pockets? According to the foreign assistance data of the U.S. State Department, over $144 million flowed into the Philippines last year—a drop from the hefty $190 million in 2023, but still a sum that speaks louder than words in the sphere of diplomacy.
The main beneficiaries of U.S. foreign aid—spanning from environmental protection, energy, health, education, disaster prevention and preparedness, HIV/AIDs, communications as well as maternal and child health to family planning concerns —are now in limbo, unsure if their critical initiatives will ever see the light of day or be consigned to the shadows in the immediate future.
Energy and environmental protection have long been the frontline of U.S. technical aid, with the USAID collaborating primarily with the DOE, ERC, DENR and other key agencies to push the Philippines toward a sustainable energy future —but now, these game-changing initiatives hang by a thread. On a larger scale, USAID has also been spearheading climate resiliency efforts—tackling biodiversity protection and arming the Philippines with tools to battle relentless and death-dealing assault of the global climate crisis.
The hand that feeds pulling away
Last week, the reinstalled Trump administration dropped the bombshell that foreign aid will temporarily stop, and every dollar will be scrutinized in his mandated review—to ensure that development partners will march in lockstep with his foreign policy agenda.
With the world's largest donor slamming down a three-month 'stop work' order, nations dependent on such funding anchor were left wondering: what do you do when the hand that’s been feeding you suddenly decides to pull away and leave you to fend for yourself?
In 2024, the Philippine energy sector cornered $8.59 million in foreign assistance from the US, essentially dwarfed by the $25.1 million poured into environmental protection and the $12.77 million allocated for disaster preparedness—figures that somehow highlight key support for these initiatives. These three pillars of U.S. foreign aid aren't just crucial—they carry the weight of Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, a move that threatens to cast a long, ominous shadow over global climate commitments and could derail the Philippines' ambitious energy transition and sustainability goals.
The USAID, in particular, has been driving critical initiatives in the Philippine energy sector, from jumpstarting development support for the nascent offshore wind industry and fortifying the capacity and training for energy regulators, then setting benchmarks for climate-resilient energy infrastructure and navigating funding pathways for nuclear energy revival—including the deployment of cutting-edge small modular reactors—all poised to reshape the nation's energy future.
Bluntly, the country's best shot lies in keeping these initiatives alive, but the burning question remains: will the next wave of US-funded programs materialize to close the gap and guide the full development cycle of game-changing infrastructure that will shape the country’s energy future? At this juncture, questions are piling up faster than answers can surface, leaving stakeholders grasping at straws with little to cling on to in the face of mounting uncertainties.
Dangerous gamble in Paris fallout
According to global experts, the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement wasn’t just a political stunt - it’s a seismic shift sending shockwaves through the very foundation of global climate action, with consequences that will ripple through generations to come.
Being the world’s largest economy and second-largest emitter of greenhouse gases, the US retreat from that international climate accord didn’t just raise eyebrows, it ignited heated debates: how will the void left by American leadership derail efforts to tackle climate change? And how will vulnerable nations which depend on global support to fight climate chaos, fare in this wobbly new world order?
There are major apprehensions that the US withdrawal would put in jeopardy the financial resources needed to power the green revolution and energy transition agendas – which are key to holding the line at 1.5 degrees C global warming limit.
The Paris Agreement was the linchpin for mobilizing critical climate finance, with developed nations led by the US injecting capital into developing countries to fuel green energy projects—from renewable energy facilities to energy efficiency ventures, climate adaptation as well as sustainable infrastructure development—funds that are now more crucial than ever for building a resilient, low-carbon future.
And the US is not just a major funder; it is also a key player in international financial institutions like the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the Green Climate Fund, which have historically relied on its contributions to underwrite large-scale green projects across the globe.
Now that Trumpian policy has taken the US out of the climate diplomacy equation, what does the future hold in humanity's fight for survival: will we just make ourselves busy dodging extreme weather events—or is there still hope that Europe and our ‘superpower’ Asian neighbors will step up and save us from this tragic mess?
For feedback and suggestions, please email at: [email protected]