GUEST COLUMNIST

The recent statement by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), emphasizing its steadfast commitment to constitutional neutrality, arrives at a critical juncture amid heightened political discussions and public scrutiny. This affirmation is timely and vital, underscoring the essential principle that military institutions must remain apolitical to protect democracy effectively.

Since the establishment of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, crafted explicitly to avoid repeating past authoritarian excesses, a clear delineation between military power and political activity has been foundational to our democratic governance. The Constitution expressly prohibits military involvement in partisan politics, not as a bureaucratic formality but as a cornerstone of democratic integrity and stability. By reiterating this commitment, the AFP reminds both the public and political actors of this critical safeguard.

Historically, when military institutions cross into political terrain, democratic institutions weaken, public confidence erodes, and the risk of instability rises significantly. The AFP's declared neutrality acts as a protective barrier, preserving democratic processes from undue interference or coercion. It ensures that political decision-making remains firmly within the civilian domain, shaped solely by electoral processes and citizen participation.

Critically, the AFP’s role remains unequivocally clear: defending national sovereignty, maintaining public order, and securing stability—all fundamental prerequisites for democracy to thrive. Any deviation from these core responsibilities risks undermining democratic legitimacy. By publicly reinforcing its constitutional neutrality, the AFP reassures Filipinos of its allegiance not to political factions or personalities but to the rule of law and democratic governance.

This commitment, however, places an equal burden of responsibility on civilian leaders and political actors to respect these boundaries. Attempts to politicize the military, overtly or subtly, must be categorically rejected by both the AFP and society at large. Ensuring military neutrality is thus not solely a military duty—it requires vigilant and active support from all sectors of society.

For the public, understanding and supporting the AFP's commitment means fostering an environment where democracy can genuinely flourish. It means recognizing that political conflicts must be resolved through democratic processes, judicial systems, and lawful mechanisms, not by military intervention. A neutral AFP protects not just democratic institutions but also the sovereignty of the people, who must remain the ultimate source of political authority.
In reaffirming its constitutional neutrality, the AFP has demonstrated more than mere institutional fidelity; it has set an example for national unity, democratic resilience, and constitutional adherence. This stance deserves broad support and must be mirrored universally across the political spectrum and within civil society.

Ultimately, the AFP’s commitment serves as a powerful reminder of democracy’s fragility and the continual necessity of safeguarding its integrity. Its constitutional neutrality is essential, not optional, and must remain beyond question. Maintaining this commitment strengthens the very foundations of our democracy, securing it for future generations.

(Lt. Gen. Jaime S. de los Santos served with distinction as a military professional, 42nd Commanding Gen. Philippine Army, 1st Force Commander, UN Multi-National Peacekeeping Force in East Timor, former member, UP Board of Regents and Professorial Lecturer II (part-time), UP-Diliman.)retired AFP personnel.)