Many conservatives fret over Trump’s war on tech giants

Published September 11, 2018, 12:00 AM

by manilabulletin_admin

By Agence France-Presse

President Donald Trump’s simmering war against Silicon Valley is raising concerns, notably among conservatives, about a politically motivated crackdown on tech firms that could damage free speech protections.

Facebook and Twitter are both tightening rules for political ads in response to concerns that the online platforms were manipulated during the 2016 US election. (AFP/File / CHANDAN KHANNA / MANILA BULLETIN)

The attacks from the White House coincide with a Justice Department announcement that it would convene talks on whether social media firms are “stifling” speech or harming competition, and precedes a series of hearings by regulators to review how antitrust laws apply to digital giants.

Trump in recent days has stepped up his attacks on the tech industry, claiming that Google suppresses conservatives and promotes “left-wing” news sources and then issuing a vague warning to Facebook, Google and Twitter to “be careful.”

Trump’s criticism of political bias was echoed by some Republican lawmakers at hearings on Capitol Hill featuring Twitter and Facebook top executives.

The prospect of a legal crackdown on Big Tech has industry leaders understandably worried, but many conservative activists are also worried about punishing one of America’s most important industries for political reasons.
– Constitutional confusion –

John Samples, vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute, said the Trump administration in claiming “censorship” is misapplying the constitution’s First Amendment free speech protection.

“The First Amendment sharply limits government power over speech. It does not limit private governance of speech,” Samples said in a blog post.

“Government officials bullying private companies contravenes a culture of free speech. Needless to say, having the Justice Department investigate those companies looks a lot like a threat to the companies’ freedom.”

Randolph May, president of the Free State Foundation, a think tank that supports a deregulatory agenda, also warned against a government effort to regulate algorithms like those that Google uses.

“It would be unwise, as a matter of policy, to lodge the power to police search neutrality in the government’s hands,” May said in a column for the Washington Times.

“Because search results may be manipulated easily by those who design the algorithms, it would be foolish to risk giving government officials control over them. The temptation for government to abuse this power to promote its own messages — its own version of what is most ‘relevant’ — is evident.”

American Enterprise Institute fellow James Pethokoukis said Trump and his allies may not have considered what type of precedent he could set if one of his political opponents wins the White House.

“Have they thought about the possibility that, say, president Elizabeth Warren might latch onto the latest Trumpopulist thinking to create a Federal Internet Platform Commission to regulate the sector?” Pethokoukis said in a blog post.